PlayStat
Proposal v1 · 28 Oct 2026
待 Elvin review
Social direction / 01

Make the research
part of the game.

A proposed social system for PlayStat: sports questions, clear evidence and a recognisable navy-and-green identity.

Existing identity. New editorial formats.#01024F#0AEB7DPoppins / Plus Jakarta Sans
PlayStat
Start here / Sports research

Read the game.
Check the
evidence.

Explore the research prototype.

Forecast comparison is planned.
playstat.com

01 / Brand introduction. Candidate pinned cover. Strong promise, visible product status.

PlayStat
Read the number / 01
80%

win rate.
Still a loss?

The price you pay matters.

Illustrative example · before fees
10 contracts at $0.90. Eight pay $1.
$9 cost → $8 payout. Learn why →

02 / Educational carousel. One number earns attention. The same card explains its limits.

PlayStat
Wallet notes / 01

Big position.
Incomplete
story.

Entry priceCheck the cost
Position statusOpen or closed?
Completed gamesCheck the sample
Observed activity is a research lead.
Read the wallet-analysis guide →

03 / Wallet literacy. Structured evidence, with no invented ranking or performance claim.

PlayStat
Inside PlayStat / Research prototype

Choose a game.
Inspect the
evidence.

Actual game list from the research prototype, captured 18 October 2026
Actual capture · 18 Oct 2026 · not live
Explore the prototype →

04 / Product walkthrough. One real task. Refresh the historical capture before publishing.

PlayStat
Game question / Your view

Which stat
changes
your view?

Recent form · Lineup news · Market price
Tell us what you would check first.

05 / Community question. Sports energy through original court geometry. Invite a reasoned answer.

PlayStat
Research notes / The method

Every result
needs
a record.

01Original question
02Observation time
03Source & outcome
04What is unknown
An editorial standard for the series.
Follow the research notes →

06 / Research journal. Explain the method without suggesting a new product feature has shipped.

Review concepts, not published posts. No real match prediction or wallet result is presented here. These are contact-sheet previews; final exports and full carousels are not produced. All captions and evidence requirements are in the full review.

What the review found

Keep the identity.
Clarify the reason to follow.

The inspected Instagram grid already repeats a navy footer, green mark and swipe arrow. Its bio and sports clips give little explanation of the research product.

The proposed change gives the feed distinct series and a clear route from a sports question to the evidence.

Inspect the existing profile ↗
Proposed profile copy

Sports research, explained.
Games, market prices & wallet activity.
Explore the research prototype ↓

Candidate pins: Start here · Read a wallet record · What the prototype does today.

Historical planning documents contain stronger winning and live-AI promises than the current public product supports. Draft copy here follows the current prototype status.

Selected from your references

Borrow the clarity and sports energy.

Both supplied searches were inspected. These references inform composition and tone; their media are not reused in the post concepts.

Reference inspection covered visible frames and metadata. View counts do not establish design effectiveness.

Proposed pilot / after approval

Six posts. Two weeks. One clear purpose.

Start with Instagram and adapt source-linked summaries for X. Channel priority remains provisional until current audience analytics are checked.

W1 · TUESDAY / EDUCATION

An 80% win rate can still lose

Five-slide arithmetic explainer. CTA: save the example.

W1 · THURSDAY / PRODUCT

Choose a game. Inspect the evidence.

Refresh the prototype capture. CTA: explore the workflow.

W1 · SUNDAY / DISCUSSION

Which stat changes your view?

One question. CTA: reply with a reason.

W2 · TUESDAY / WALLET NOTES

Big position. Incomplete story.

Explain entry price, status and sample. CTA: read the guide.

W2 · THURSDAY / EDUCATION

Market price and forecast

Explain the two sources. Label forecast comparison planned.

W2 · SUNDAY / RESEARCH

Every result needs a record

Show the editorial method. CTA: follow the research notes.

Measure useful attention

Education: saves and shares. Product: attributable research visits. Questions: substantive replies. Compare per 1,000 impressions within each platform.

What remains unknown

Current analytics, audience intent and historical footage rights. The public sample cannot establish that this direction will outperform the existing feed.